In Re ZCB’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited
1 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Stansbury v. California · Pennsylvania v. Bruder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at custodial, post-petition, and informal adjustment stages of proceedings under this chapter. . . . Counsel must be provided for a child not represented by the child's parent, guardian, or custodian at custodial, post-petition, and informal adjustment stages of proceedings under this chapter.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“is to inform the parent or guardian why a minor is in custody and to allow the parent or guardian to be involved in the minor's decision whether to consent to take a chemical test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“upon the files, records, and minutes or transcript of the evidence of the juvenile court, giving appreciable weight to the findings of the juvenile court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.