Damron v. Damron’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on D. H. v. J. H. · 121 Ohio App. 3d 396 - Inscoe v. Inscoe · S.N.E. v. R.L.B. · 100 Wash. 2d 325 - In Re the Marriage of Cabalquinto · Stroman v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may modify a prior custody order after the two-year period following the date of entry of an order establishing custody if the court finds: a. On the basis of facts that have arisen since the prior order or which were unknown to the court at the time of the prior order, a material change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or the parties; and b. The modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. Roberson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.