Peltier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2021
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Gerace · Falcon v. State · 434 Pa. Super. 309 - Commonwealth v. Anderson · State v. Saavedra · DeCoteau v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In post-conviction relief proceedings, a district court's findings of fact will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Cue v. State , 2003 ND 97 , ¶ 10, 663 N.W.2d 637 . A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if it is not supported by the evidence, or if, although there is some evidence to support it, a reviewing court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. DeCoteau v. State , 2000 ND 44 , ¶ 10, 608 N.W.2d 240 . Questions of law are fully reviewable on appeal of a post-conviction proceeding. Peltier v. State , 2003 ND 27 , ¶ 6, 657 N.W.2d 238 ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parshall v. State · Olson v. State“When presented with a binding plea agreement, the court is limited to three options: the court may accept the agreement, reject the agreement, or defer its decision until receipt of a presentence report. If the court accepts a binding plea agreement, the court may not impose a sentence less favorable than the sentence provided for in the plea agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Henes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.