Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 ND 39 - State v. Klose

State v. Klose’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Noorlun (2005), Klose v. State (2008)

41 state decisions

250200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Lewis v. United States · United States v. Lincoln · United States v. Rodriguez · State v. Manke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After the jurors have retired for deliberation, if they desire to be informed on a point of law arising in the cause, or to have any testimony about which they are in doubt or disagreement read to them, they, upon their request, must be conducted into the courtroom by the officer who has them in custody. Upon their being brought into court, the information required must be given in the presence of, or after notice to, the state’s attorney and the defendant or his counsel, or after they have been called.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy which should be resort ed to only when there is a fundamental defect or occurrence in the proceedings of the trial which makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen a problem arises during a trial, the party affected must bring the irregularity to the court's attention and seek appropriate remedial action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.