Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 ND 59 - Argabright v. Rodgers

Argabright v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, Wisconsin · Schlossman & Gunkelman, Inc. v. Tallman · Auction Effertz, Ltd. v. Schecher · Hector v. Metro Centers, Inc. · Krank v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n apparent or ostensible agency must rest upon conduct or communications of the principal which, reasonably interpreted, causes a third person to believe that the agent has authority to act for and on behalf of the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the principal intentionally or by want of ordinary care causes a third person to believe another to be his agent, who really is not employed by him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.