State v. Norman’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (§ 210304 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Smith v. Doe · Jones v. Murray · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Boling v. Romer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law, and we uphold the statute unless its challenger can demonstrate the statute's unconstitutionality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Kenny“subservient to the goal of statutory interpretation: to ascertain and effectuate legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“No part of this code is retroactive unless it is expressly declared to be so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.