Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 ND 71 - Vandeberg v. State

Vandeberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Klose v. State (2008), Johnson v. State (2004)

33 state decisions

170200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. State · Steinbach v. State · State v. Goulet · Belgarde v. Rosenau · Weaver v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While our case law requires a petitioner to establish a basis for post-conviction relief, a petitioner need not provide evidence or proof with an application. N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-04. A petitioner meeting the required conditions and applying for post-conviction relief must “set forth a concise statement of each ground for relief, and specify the relief requested. Argument, citations, and discussion of authorities are unnecessary.” N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-04(1). “Affidavits or other material supporting the application may be attached, but are unnecessary.” N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-04(2).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A genuine issue of material fact exists if reasonable minds could draw different inferences and reach different conclusions from the undisputed facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “State must not merely 'respond' to put a petitioner on its proof; it must show the trial court it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law in its motion for summary disposition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.