State v. Thorson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Goulet · City of Grand Forks v. Ramstad · State v. Yineman · State v. Sievers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Brady , the United States Supreme Court held that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused violates due process if the evidence is material to guilt or punishment. To establish a Brady violation, the defendant must prove: (1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different' if the evidence had been disclosed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kardor · State v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.