State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. MacDonald · Parr v. United States · United States v. Bratcher · United States v. Lanham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appeal may be taken by the defendant from: 1. A verdict of guilty; 2. A final judgment of conviction; 3. An order refusing a motion in arrest of judgment; 4. An order denying a motion for a new trial; or 5. An order made after judgment affecting any substantial right of the party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jorgenson“Although '[s]tatutes conferring the right to appeal must be liberally construed to maintain the right to appeal,' the party appealing bears the burden of showing that the right to appeal comes within the language of a statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jorgenson“The right of appeal in North Dakota is governed purely by statute, and an order is appealable only if it comes within the provisions of a specific statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jorgenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.