2003 OK CIV APP 28 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mocnik v. Mocnik · Thrash v. Thrash · Archer v. Archer · Abbott v. Abbott · Ford v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable living expenses could justify a child support award in excess of an extrapolation for income exceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“at some point, child support for each additional $1,000 in income approaches zero.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an additional amount determined by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.