Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 Pa. Super. 119 - Commonwealth v. Mann

2003 Pa. Super. 119 - Commonwealth v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably 2010 Pa. Super. 46 - Commonwealth v. Moury (2010), 2013 Pa. Super. 70 - Commonwealth v. Griffin (2013)

25 state decisions

120200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Grant · Commonwealth v. Kimball · Commonwealth v. Brown · 368 Pa. Super. 372 - Commonwealth v. Petras · Commonwealth v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that counsel is presumed effective and the burden of proving ineffectiveness rests with the appellant. To prevail on a claim alleging counsel’s ineffectiveness, Appellant must demonstrate: (1) that the underlying claim is of arguable merit; (2) that counsel’s course of conduct was without a reasonable basis designed to effectuate his Ghent’s interest; and (3) that [s]he was prejudiced by counsel’s ineffectiveness. In order to meet the prejudice prong of the ineffectiveness standard, [Appellant] must show that there is a reasonable probability that but for the act or omission in question the outcome of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “issues challenging the discretionary aspects of sentencing must be raised in a post-sentence motion or by raising the claim during the sentencing proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]ssues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.