2003 Pa. Super. 140 - Shepp v. Shepp’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reynolds v. States · Romer Governor of Colorado v. Evans · Davis v. Beason · McMillen v. McMillen · 394 Pa. Super. 30 - Zummo v. Zummo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Father’s] promotion of his beliefs to his stepdaughter involved not merely the superficial exposure of a child to the theoretical notion of criminal conduct, but constituted a vigorous attempt at moral suasion and recruitment by threats of future punishment. The child was, in fact, warned that only by committing an illicit act could she comply with the requirements of her religion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shepp v. Shepp“The question whether we would find ... benign advocacy of drug abuse or child prostitution were they presented as foundational religious beliefs is no question at all.”). . As noted previously, see supra n. 3, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shepp v. Shepp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.