2003 Pa. Super. 262 - Commonwealth v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mouzin · United States v. Hoffman · Reese v. Peters · Johnson v. State · 376 Pa. Super. 493 - Commonwealth v. Vance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Appellant’s] admission to the bar allows us to assume that he has the training, knowledge, and ability to represent a client who has chosen him, and that he has retained the ability to render effective assistance to defendant at trial, notwithstanding his suspension for failure to pay his registration dues. To find a defendant’s [S]ixth [A]mendment right to counsel to have been violated, there must be additional factors above and beyond a mere suspension for nonpayment of bar dues.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.