2003 Pa. Super. 263 - Commonwealth v. Millward’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Commonwealth v. Clair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Our [S]upreme [C]ourt in Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48 , 813 A.2d 726 (2002), recently set forth a new general rule providing that parties ‘should wait to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel until collateral review.’ Id. at 738.” Commonwealth v. Rosendary, 818 A.2d 526, 527 (Pa.Super.2003). The Supreme Court dictated that this new rule is to be applied to all cases currently pending on direct appeal where a claim of ineffectiveness has been properly raised and preserved, as in this case. See Grant, 813 A.2d at 738-39 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.