2003 Pa. Super. 289 - Commonwealth v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Grant · Commonwealth v. Bomar · Commonwealth v. Clemmons · Commonwealth v. Howard · 454 Pa. Super. 428 - Commonwealth v. Yager
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the [underlying] claim is of arguable merit; (2) that counsel had no reasonable strategic basis for his or her action or inaction; (3) that, but for the errors and omissions of counsel, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.