2003 Pa. Super. 369 - Leshko v. Leshko’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on R.G. v. T.D. · 448 Pa. Super. 525 - Rg v. Td · D.H. v. B.O.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 6107(a) requires that a hearing be conducted at which time the petitioner must prove the allegation of abuse by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. S.W. v. S.F.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.