Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 Pa. Super. 378 - Commonwealth v. Tejeda

2003 Pa. Super. 378 - Commonwealth v. Tejeda’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2023

10 state decisions

40200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. · 2002 Pa. Super. 203 - Commonwealth v. Griffin · 2000 Pa. Super. 76 - Commonwealth v. Stafford · 443 Pa. Super. 414 - Commonwealth v. Garcia · Commonwealth v. Jacobs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a mistrial is within the discretion of the trial court. A mistrial upon motion of one of the parties is required only when an incident is of such a nature that its unavoidable effect is to deprive the appellant of a fair and impartial trial. It is within the trial court’s discretion to determine whether a defendant was prejudiced by the incident that is the basis of a motion for a mistrial. On appeal, our standard of review is whether the trial court abused that discretion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.