Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 SD 36 - Keller v. Keller

Keller v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Sazama v. State Ex Rel. Muilenberg (2007), Smetana v. Smetana (2007)

26 state decisions

120200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malcolm v. Malcolm · Billion v. Billion · Pesicka v. Pesicka · Fox v. Fox · Deuchar v. Foland Ranch, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The award of attorney fees is authorized by SDCL 15-17-38. Whether an award is warranted, however, is left to the sound discretion of the court. When making this determination, the court must first decide whether the fees are reasonable; then, using our standard factors, it must establish whether an award is necessary. -The elements a court should consider are “the property owned ,by each party, their relative incomes, whether the property of the parties is in fixed or liquid assets, and whether the actions of either party unreasonably increased the time spent on the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To form the basis for a subsequent finding of contempt, an order must state the details of compliance in such clear, specific and unambiguous terms that the person to whom it is directed will know exactly what duties or obligations are imposed upon her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The required elements for ... civil contempt are (1) the existence of an order; (2) knowledge of the order; (3) ability to comply with the order; and (4) willful or contumacious disobedience of the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.