Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 SD 71 - State v. Boston

State v. Boston’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2022

21 state decisions

80200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc. · State v. Goodroad · State v. Rufener · State v. Frazier · State v. Oster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting other acts evidence. 2. Whether the trial court erred in denying the suppression of Owen’s statements to law enforcement. 3. Whether the trial court erred by denying Owen’s requested self-defense instruction. 4. Whether there was sufficient evidence to prove first degree murder. 5. Whether the State had jurisdiction over Owen’s crimes. 6. Whether there was a Batson violation in the State’s exercise of its peremptory challenges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether there is sufficient evidence in the record which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; in making this determination, the Court will accept the evidence, and the most favorable inference fairly drawn therefrom, which will support the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.