Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UT 18 - Jackson v. Mateus

Jackson v. Mateus’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2025

10 state decisions

50200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp. · West Jordan v. Morrison · Boyer v. Seal · Versluis v. Guaranty National Companies · Clark v. Brings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, we review the district court's ruling on summary judgment for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To prevail on a negligence claim, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed a duty of reasonable care to him or her. 'Absent a showing of duty, [the plaintiff] cannot recover.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'as to render all parts thereof relevant and meaningful, and interpretations are to be avoided which render some part of a provision nonsensical or absurd.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.