State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
85 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Winfield (2006), Pratt v. Nelson (2007)
85 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 501 · 26 U.S.C. § 508
Relies on Grannis v. Ordean · Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · State v. Pena · State v. Dunn · State v. Hansen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel, either by statement or act, affirmatively represented to the [trial] court that he or she had no objection to the [proceedings].”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage“if upon reviewing the evidence and all inferences that can be reasonably drawn from it, [we conclude] that some evidence exists from which a reasonable jury could find that the elements of the crime had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Arave · State v. Ellis“We have held repeatedly that on appeal, a party cannot take advantage of an error committed at trial when that party led the trial court into committing the error.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.