State v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), Pratt v. Nelson (2007)
1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Verde · Spradlin v. State · State v. Eldredge · State v. Hamilton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“() [aln error exists; (#i) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (iii) the error is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pullman · State v. Lee“[In most cireamstances the term manifest injustice is synonymous with the plain error standard ....”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pullman · State v. Powell“Unless a party objects to an instruction or the failure to give an instruction, the instruction may not be assigned as error except to avoid a manifest injustice.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pullman · State v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.