State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart (2004), State v. Levin (2006)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · Berkemer v. McCarty · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[An] officer must be able to point to specific facts which, considered with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.... [D]ue weight must be given, not to [an officer’s] inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch, but to specific reasonable inferences which [an officer] is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his experience.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. NIMER · State v. Parke“'Though an officer's subjective belief alone is insufficient to validate or invalidate a Terry frisk, to completely disregard an officer's subjective belief excludes a potentially important element of the analysis. ...”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'When a case involves the reasonableness of a search and seizure, we afford little discretion to the district court because there must be statewide standards that guide law enforcement and prosecutorial officials'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.