State v. Valdez’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2022
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Ybarra v. Illinois · Michigan v. Summers · Steagald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ha[ve] no weapons in [their] hands and [are] in no position to violently interfere with the arrest”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'we must first determine whether the officer's action was justified at its inception. If so, we must then consider whether the resulting detention was reasonably related in scope to the cireum-stances that justified the interference in the first place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lowe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.