Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UTAPP 107 - State v. Chansamone

State v. Chansamone’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Michigan v. · State v. Lopez · State v. Finlayson · Kaysville City v. Mulcahy · State v. Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] search of an arrestee's person is valid ... [regardless of whether] it shortly precedes the arrest, `so long as the arrest and the search are substantially contemporaneous and probable cause to effect the arrest exists independent of the evidence seized in the search.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “facts and cireumstances within the officer's knowledge that are sufficient to warrant a prudent person, or one of reasonable caution, in believing, in the cireumstances shown, that the suspect has committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We state the facts in a light most favorable to the trial court's ruling denying [al motion to suppress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.