2003 UT App 131 - Busch v. Busch’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc. · Stevensen v. Goodson · MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc. · Parrish v. LAYTON CITY CORPORATION · Matthews v. Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's determination of whether res judicata bars an action presents a question of law. We review such questions for correctness, according no particular deference to the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“nothing in the record shows that the elements of [issue preclusion] have been met”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The party asserting res judicata has the burden to prove its elements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.