2003 UT App 158 - State v. Dominguez’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · United States v. Roenigk · State v. Saunders · In Re Halverson · State v. Decorso
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the testimony complained of was initially elicited by defense counsel's cross-examination of [the witness], any error was invited. We have held repeatedly that on appeal, a party cannot take advantage of an error committed at trial when that party led the trial court into committing the error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“necessary as context for admissible evidence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.