Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UTAPP 181 - State v. Grossi

State v. Grossi’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Maryland v. Buie · Illinois v. Charles McArthur · State v. Pena · State v. Sery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Since a district court is in a unique position to assess the credibility of witnesses and weigh the evidence, the court of appeals may not substitute its judgment as to a factual question unless the district court's finding is clearly erroneous”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Consent is a factual finding that should be made based on the totality of the cireumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.