Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UT App 212 - State v. Lehi

2003 UT App 212 - State v. Lehi’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McCarthy v. United States · State v. Manussier · State v. Gibbons · Haase v. United States · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ask [the dlefendant if he would admit the facts required by [the incapable of safely operating a vehicle] prong, i.e., that he operated or was in actual physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated to such a degree that he was incapable of safely operating a vehicle”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[Wlhether the trial court strictly complied with constitutional and procedural requirements for entry of a guilty plea is a question of law that is reviewed for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'[wle review a trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea under an "abuse of discretion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.