2003 UT App 256 - State v. Bissegger’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2021
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Alderman v. United States · United States v. Welch · State v. Lopez · State v. Hansen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“examine whether the defendant has demonstrated a subjective expectation of privacy in the object of the challenged search ... [and] conclude, as a matter of law, whether society is willing to recognize the individual's expectation of privacy as legitimate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“as a passenger asked by a police officer to leave the car, ha[d] standing to object to the seizure and search of her personal property found inside the car.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a car passenger does not normally have standing to object to a search of the car absent an ownership or possessory interest in the car.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.