2003 UT App 273 - State v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[0]nce the opponent of a peremptory challenge has made out a prima facie case of [gender] discrimination (step 1), the burden of production shifts to the proponent of the strike to come forward with a [gender-neutral explanation (step 2). If a [genderj-neutral explanation is tendered, the trial court must then decide (step 3) whether the opponent of the strike has proved purposeful [gender] discrimination.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Valdez

2. “as a matter of law that the prosecution did not provide a gender-neutral explanation for the two strikes in question.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Flores

3. “any use of gender in the jury selection process”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Flores