Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UT App 300 - State v. Peterson

2003 UT App 300 - State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Lopez · State v. Johnson · State v. Chapman · State v. Moreno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “factual findings underlying a trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.