Bakanowski v. Bakanowski’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably 2010 UT App 139 - Connell v. Connell (2010), 2008 UT App 392 - Jensen v. Jensen (2008)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Jones · Acton v. Deliran · Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C. · Burt v. Burt · Gardner v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a serious inequity ... manifesting] a clear abuse of discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dobson v. Dobson · Dahl v. Dahl“(i) the financial condition and needs of the recipient spouse; (ii) the recipient’s earning capacity or ability to produce income; (in) the ability of the payor spouse to provide support; (iv) the length of the marriage; (v) whether the recipient spouse has custody of minor children requiring support; (vi) whether the recipient spouse worked in a business owned or operated by the payor spouse; and (vii) whether the recipient spouse directly contributed to any increase in the payor spouse’s skill by paying for education received by the payor spouse or enabling the payor spouse to attend school during the marriage.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In considering these factors, the trial court is required to make adequate factual findings on all material issues, unless the facts in the record are clear, uncontro-verted, and capable of supporting only a finding in favor of the judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mullins v. Mullins · Dahl v. Dahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.