2003 UT App 381 - State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. United States · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Monge v. California · Weaver v. Graham · Bouie v. City of Columbia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[elvery law that changes the punish, ment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Critical to relief under the Ex Post Facto Clause is not an individual's right to less punishment, but the lack of fair notice and governmental restraint when the legislature increases punishment beyond what was prescribed when the crime was consummated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.