County v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Bayles · Thrasher v. United States Liability Insurance · Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. · 19 Utah 2d 261 - Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provision and (2) the County was barred from relitigating the case, regardless of the holding of Speros, under the doctrines of claim preclusion and issue preclusion. 2 The County appeals. ISSUE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW T6 Summary judgment is properly granted only when there are no genuine issues as to material facts and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Alo injured party has no direct cause of action in contract against a tortfeasor's insurer because the insurer's liability to the injured party 'arises only secondarily, through its contractual arrangement with the [tortfeasor].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[a tortfeasor's] insurer [may] not be joined with the tort-feasor unless [such was] required by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.