2003 UT App 79 - State v. Smedley’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2024
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Larsen · United States v. Grant · United States v. Marks · United States v. Verdoorn · Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where there is no clear or specific objection and the specific ground for objection is not clear from the context[,] the theory cannot be raised on appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Itlhe standard for determining the relevancy of the evidence is very low, and even evidence with the slightest probative value is relevant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barney · State v. Hunt“'to make certain that the record he compiles will adequately preserve his arguments for review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.