Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 VT 79 - Pion v. Bean

Pion v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 45 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc. · Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux. · Cabot v. Cabot · Kanaan v. Kanaan · Soucy v. Soucy Motors, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “stated that, in assessing punitive damages, the fact-finder must take into account the character and the standing of the party, the malice or wantonness of the party's conduct, and the party's financial status.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We will not disturb the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, despite inconsistencies or substantial evidence to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]unitive damages by their nature cannot be precisely measured”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.