Pion v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 45 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc. · Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux. · Cabot v. Cabot · Kanaan v. Kanaan · Soucy v. Soucy Motors, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stated that, in assessing punitive damages, the fact-finder must take into account the character and the standing of the party, the malice or wantonness of the party's conduct, and the party's financial status.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Eugene W. Beaudoin, Derivatively on Behalf of The New England Expedition Ltd. Partnership II & IV v. Barry E. Feldman, The New England Expedition-Colchester LLC and Colchester Managing Member Inc. · Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard Howell“We will not disturb the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, despite inconsistencies or substantial evidence to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]unitive damages by their nature cannot be precisely measured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.