State v. Jorgensen’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. United States · George Bush v. Albert Gore · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 81 Wis. 2d 491 - State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. Wilkie · 39 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Hutnik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“against governmental action that either 'shocks the conscience ... or interferes with rights implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“This court has held the due process and equal protection clauses of the Wisconsin Constitution are the substantial equivalents of their respective clauses in the federal constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quintana“[A]n argument based on equal protection essentially duplicates an argument based on due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.