State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
43
cited by 43 later decisions
7
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
43 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The instruction as a whole emphasizes with great clarity that the State bears the burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that a defendant is presumed innocent until that burden is met. In the context of the entire instruction, we conclude that [ WIS JI-CRIMINAL 140] ... which was read to the jury, did not dilute the State's burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“1 most errors, including constitutional ones, are reviewed for harmlessness. Neder, 527 U.S. at 8 . Most jury instruction errors are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Mayo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.