State v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Novell v. Migliaccio (2008), 2008 WI App 33 - State v. Edmunds (2008)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The law of the case doctrine is a 'longstanding rule that a decision on a legal issue by an appellate court establishes the law of the case, which must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial court or on later appeal.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of the law,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“`cogent, substantial, and proper reasons exist.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.