State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably State v. Gary M.B. (2004), State v. Cain (2012)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · Gross v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]egardless of the extent of the . . . [circuit] court's reasoning, [a reviewing court] will uphold a discretionary decision if there are facts in the record which would support the . . . court's decision had it fully exercised its discretion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Cain · State v. Payano“relates to a fact or proposition that is of consequence to the determination of the action”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Payano · State v. McGowan“[E]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. This subsection does not exclude the evidence when offered for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. SHESTO · State v. Jensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.