Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 WI 86 - State v. Byers

State v. Byers’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County (2004), Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Companies (2006)

31 state decisions

190200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rule, are tools, not rules. They are all designed to reach one fundamental goal: discerning legislative intent. Ignoring relevant evidence on legislative intent in the name of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “William Jefferson Clinton. ¶ 39. I write only to emphasize that canons .of statutory construction, such as the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “That depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.