State v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County (2004), County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (2009)
4 district · 45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Perrin v. United States · Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams · Chisom v. Roemer · CBS Inc. v. Primetime 24 Joint Venture
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the language of a statute is clear on its face, we need not look any further than the statutory text to determine the statute's meaning.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“a comprehensive view toward discerning legislative intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“credit, money, goods, services or anything else of value”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.