Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 WI App 155 - State v. Bolden

2003 WI App 155 - State v. Bolden’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2022

16 state decisions

100200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · 120 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Haseltine · 201 Wis. 2d 219 - State v. Sanchez · 228 Wis. 2d 707 - Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q: So if I understand, Mr. Bolden, out of the witnesses we heard in this trial, [the victim] is either lying or mistaken about the fact [3] that you guys had this mutually agreed-upon fight, is that fair to say? A: That's fair. Q: And [the witness to the incident] is mistaken in that you never were on top of [the victim] and that you never were choking [the victim], is that fair to say? A: That's fair to say. Q: And that [the witness to the incident] is mistaken in the sense that you weren't driving around on Meinecke shortly before this altercation with [the victim], is that fair to say? A: Right. . . . . Q: And that [the police sergeant who apparently investigated the incident] is mistaken when you mentioned anything about robbing [the victim]? A: Right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[State v. Kuehl, 199 Wis. 2d 143 , 545 N.W.2d 840 (Ct. App. 1995)] lacked the power to overrule [State v. Jackson, 187 Wis. 2d 431 , 523 N.W.2d 126 (Ct. App. 1994)]. Under Jackson , the State's questions here did not violate the [State v. Haseltine, 120 Wis. 2d 92 , 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984)] rule. Accordingly, Bolden's trial lawyer was not deficient for not objecting to those questions or moving for a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although Jackson and Kuehl preceded Cook, this makes no difference. Cook based its ruling on 'power' not policy. If the court of appeals lacked the 'power' to overrule or modify its prior decisions after Cook, it certainly also lacked that power before Cook.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.