State v. Lombard’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Estelle v. Smith · Kansas v. Crane · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'If the overall meaning communicated by the instructions was a correct statement of the law, no grounds for reversal exist.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`in a pending or subsequent criminal prosecution'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“and that WIS. STAT. § 980.06 provides that when persons are determined to be sexually violent, they are committed to the custody of the Department of Health and Family Services for control, care, and treatment until they are no longer sexually violent; the instruction also explained the opportunities for supervised release, periodic reexaminations, and petitions for discharge. Id., ¶ 16. Lombard argued on appeal that this instruction was incomplete because it did not advise the jury that, if it found Lombard to be a sexually violent person, the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lombard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.