2003 WI App 168 - State v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. Cronic · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Rock v. Arkansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no witness may testify as an expert on issues of domestic law,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Judge, I have no reason to believe in light of what Mr. McDowell has told me that he will not get up there and testify as to the truth. Therefore when he takes the stand I will be asking him questions, specific questions with respect to his testimony before this jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDowell v. Kingston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.