Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 WIAPP 256 - Turner v. Taylor

Turner v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably First American Title Insurance v. Dahlmann (2006), 2007 WI App 182 - Smiljanic v. Niedermeyer (2007)

88 state decisions

720200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten · Gross v. Hoffman · Bruno v. Milwaukee County · State v. Peters · 74 Wis. 2d 327 - La Barge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'If this process of analysis yields a plain, clear statutory meaning, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Section 706.09] extinguishes interests or claims that are adverse to or inconsistent with merchantable title when [specified] circumstances are present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.