2003 WI App 47 - State v. Keith’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 137 Wis. 2d 39 - State v. Zielke · State v. Jennings · State v. Piddington · 117 Wis. 2d 9 - State v. Daniels · 123 Wis. 2d 458 - State v. Renard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Suppression of evidence is 'only required when evidence has been obtained in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights, or if a statute specifically provides for the suppression remedy.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the exclusionary rule is applicable in civil and criminal proceedings only where the evidence sought to be excluded was obtained in violation of a constitutional right or a statute that specifically requires suppression of wrongfully or illegally obtained evidence as a sanction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Popenhagen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.