State v. Gary M. B.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neder v. United States · 208 Wis. 2d 166 - In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. Cook · Ohler v. United States · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gary M.B. · Zola v. Kelley“a pre-trial ruling permitting the introduction of prior conviction evidence effectively forces the defendant to introduce the evidence preemptively, and the defendant's introduction of the evidence should not therefore constitute a waiver of his or her prior objection to its admissibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gary M.B.“[The evidence of prior convictions] must not be used for any other purpose and particularly you should bear in mind that a criminal conviction at some previous time is not proof of guilt of the offense now charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gary M.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.