2003 WI App 78 - State v. Schell’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 226 Wis. 2d 637 - State v. Horn · 192 Wis. 2d 1 - State Ex Rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 220 Wis. 2d 251 - State v. Isaac J.R. · 119 Wis. 2d 546 - State v. Sepulveda · 173 Wis. 2d 439 - State v. Hays
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may also require as a condition of probation that the probationer be confined during such period of the term of probation as the court prescribes, but not to exceed one year. The court may grant the privilege of leaving the county jail, Huber facility, work camp, or tribal jail during the hours or periods of employment or other activity under s. 303.08(1) while confined under this subsection .... In those counties with a Huber facility-under s. 303.09, the sheriff shall determine whether confinement under this subsection is to be in that facility or in the county jail....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Galecke“Sheriff's or superintendent's general authority. Subject to the limitations under sub. (3), a county sheriff or a superintendent of a house of correction may place in the home detention program any person confined in jail who has been arrested for, charged with, convicted of or sentenced for a crime. The sheriff or superintendent may transfer any prisoner in the home detention program to the jail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Galecke“Prior to the expiration of any probation period, the court, for cause and by order, may extend probation for a stated period or modify the terms and conditions thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Galecke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.